North Seattle Community College
ENGL&102: Composition
JC Clapp
Argument Synthesis Assignment
Overview:
This Argument Synthesis assignment requires you to use your analysis, research, and critical thinking skills to formulate a unique argument (persuasive thesis) that uses researched evidence to support it. You'll be writing a 5 page (at least 1,100 words) academic essay, complete with a Works Cited page (Chapter 4 in A Sequence for Academic Writing spells out the details). In your essay, you will be focused on answering this question: What should be the role of science in society?
Choosing a "way in" to the topic: For this paper, your task is to analytically answer the question "What should be the role of science in society?" -- and that's a very broad question! So, in order to approach it, you will need to choose a very specific angle or "way in" to it. Think very carefully about the part that science, scientific education, scientific research, and scientific methodology should play in society and what changes we need to make (or what we should continue to do) to put science in that role you've defined. You'll need to explain to us what role you feel science should play (and have research to support your position) and explain, using a particular example or "way in", what society would look like if the role of science was viewed in the way you view it. For example, you might want to focus in on science education, or the environment, or space exploration, or robotics. These readings in our Science and Society text are argumentative/persuasive and answer the question "What should be the role of science in society?" by using a particular focus as their examples:
"Sex, Drugs, Disasters, and the Extinction of Dinosaurs" by Stephen Jay Gould (Gould uses paleontology as his focus)
"Designer Babies" by Sharon Begley (Begley uses DNA manipulation as her "way in")
"Warm, Warmer, Warmest" by Nicholas D. Kristof (Kristof uses environmental concerns and global warming as his angle)
As you're deciding on the way you're going to approach answering the question of what the role of science in society should be, try to make your "way in" (your topic) be as narrow and defined as possible. "Global Warming" is way too broad. However, looking at the ecological damage done by coffee cup lids in the Puget Sound might work. There is a sample student paper here with the assignment sheet (same folder), so read it as a model.
Research Requirements: You need to decide what your "way in" will be and then use that particular topic to answer the question posed. This assignment requires that you use at least one of the readings from one of our class textbooks (any part of either Science and Society or Lies, Damned Lies, and Science as evidence for your thesis). Then, you will need to research on your own to find at least two other research sources to use as evidence as well. If you'd like to watch a video explanation, try going to YouTube (this video wasn't created by me!): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=trIJ4dptq7I (this is the first of a multi-part lecture on writing an argument/analysis synthesis)
Argument Structure: Your goal here is to write a thesis-driven essay that is argumentative/persuasive: you are going to be trying to convince your reader to consider your definition and angle on the role of science and society as a valid one. To do this, you will need a clear thesis/claim grounded in what you know about the rhetorical triangle, a clearly formulated argument strategy, evidence that uses rhetorical appeals, and a strong organizational structure (the PIE approach works well).
Reflection on the Process: After you've written your essay, think about what the experience of writing this essay (and the experience of taking this class) may have taught you. For a minimum of one page, talk about your process as a writer and thinker. How has your approach to writing and researching changed? What did you learn this quarter? What did you hope to learn, but didn't? How do you see what we've worked on in this class being applied to your life outside of school? Do you feel your critical thinking, writing, and reading skills have been improved? If so, how and in what ways? You don't have to prescriptively answer all of these questions, but reflect on the writing of this essay and the taking of this course.
Formatting and Submission: For this assignment, please use standard MLA formatting (double-space, use 1" margins, 12 point font in Times New Roman, etc.), and save your file as a .doc or .docx or .rtf or .pdf file type so it can easily be opened. If you need assistance formatting your essay in MLA format, there's a great tutorial on YouTube (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1PRb6557EmI) -- that video walks you through how to format your essay and then, if you'd like, save that format as your default for Word. If you need help formatting your MLA works cited page, this YouTube video explains it well: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aVplNS6ASAk You will need to upload your file to the appropriate drop-box marked "Argument Synthesis" found under the Week 11 folder under the "Get Assignments" area of our class webpage. No late papers will be accepted.
Grading Criteria: The below criteria will be used to assess your work . . .
Your interpretive and analytical thesis (your claim) is stated clearly and early in the analysis, with all parts of the essay to follow supporting that thesis (your thesis is argumentative/persuasive). Your "way in" topic/approach is very narrow and limited and precise. You've chosen a small slice of a topic to analyze and use to represent your larger answer/view on "What should be the role of science in society?"
All of the parts of your argument can be easily identified (claim, evidence, addressing the opposition, qualifiers, underlying assumptions) and are used to propel your thesis.
You have clearly and carefully considered the rhetorical situation (the audience, tone, and purpose) and have addressed it effectively.
Your essay uses PIE to organize the information in a clear and cohesive way with transitions between ideas. The paper begins with an engaging introduction and is pulled together by a strong conclusion.
You have summarized any research only enough so that the reader understands what it's about and why it's included (summary is sparse and done with purpose). When research is used, there is a clear identification of the the author's name, title of the article, and publication information (where you found it) -- and proper MLA parenthetical citations are used throughout the paper. Uses paraphrases and quotes from your research with clear purpose (with proper citation) -- uses PIE paragraph organization.
Your evidence effectively covers a range of rhetorical appeals: ethos, logos, pathos (ethical, logical and emotional)
Analysis is systematically done and answers the question "So What?" -- by the end of the paper it is very clear what you feel the role of science in society should be and you've convinced your reader that your perspective has merit and should be considered
You have included a Works Cited page at the end of your paper with correct MLA formatting -- and your Works Cited page includes at least three entries:
You have used at least one of the readings from our Science and Society or Lies, Damned Lies, and Science books in your paper as evidence to support your thesis
You have used at least two research sources that you found on your own (not found in our class books) as evidence to support your thesis
Be about 5 pages in length (at least 1,100 words)
Be carefully edited with well constructed sentences and effective grammar and punctuation
Has a thorough and thoughtful one-page reflection at the end that explains what you learned (or didn't!), the process you went through, and how the class as a whole worked for you